Regarding the idea of necessary (and therefore ethical) violence, I’d have to affirm that (at least on this side of the return/judging-renewal of Christ) some situations do require it. I suppose I’d want to fully affirm your notions of the offensiveness of the peaceful way of Christ, yet at the same time affirm that sometimes violence is the only possible response, and therefore is the only way to sign-post the way to peace.

The offensiveness of Christ’s way will always be an affront to my desire to be a liberator, saviour or hero that brings peace by my efforts or words (both violent or non-violent). Christ, not me, is the Prince of Peace. That’s an offense to my sinful pride.

sorry that’s a bit of a rambling, uncoherent comment – but your post was very thought-provoking.

Cheers sir,

-d-